Logo

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 29.06.2025 03:23

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Will Trump's tariffs harm the USA?

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Ananda Lewis, Celebrated MTV VJ, Dead at 52 - Rolling Stone

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Were you ever in love with your teacher?

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Russia can stop this any time.

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Shiba Inu risks 18% drop, but whales keep buying – What do they know? - AMBCrypto

Thank you.

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

US-China trade war sideswipes Europe’s carmakers - politico.eu

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

Let’s just make it real clear:

Finebaum on House settlement: NCAA dead, Olympic and women sports crushed, football wins - AL.com

What’s next?

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Apple Knows AI Isn’t What People Really Want, but It Can’t Say That - Gizmodo

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Jefferies Is Doubling Down On Nvidia. Here Are 3 Other Stocks The Firm Loves Now. - Barchart.com

Just in the last 5 years:

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

What causes you to be tired all the time and major headaches?